He/Him/His: “He is a writer and wrote that essay himself. Those ideas are his. I like both him and his ideas.”
Using the above standard male guideline as a basis, here are the new pronouns I invented (including pronunciation) that you can use for me, if you are woke enough to care about such inane nonsense:
E/H/Z: “E (ee) is a writer and wrote that essay Hself (heh-self). Those ideas are Z (ehz). I like both H (heh) and Z (ehz) ideas.”
And being "gender neutral" terms, I will gladly use them on anyone who insists on insisting that I defer to their own idiosyncratic pronouns, particularly those who have egos so big they refer to their individual selves as "they/them/theirs"!
(It used to be worth a chuckle to recall when Queen Victoria said "WE are not amused," applying the so-called "royal we" -- or when the "editorial we" let bloviating opinionists claim to speak for the entire newspaper staff. Then again, around 1900, Her Majesty had a 50 inch waist and weighed in at 240 pounds at 5'0" tall, so a one-person plurality was not beyond consideration for her.)
I will also feel comfortable using these legally bullet-proof pronouns for the delusional "gender fluid" or those who believe they can ignore the biology of xx/xy chromosomes and "identify" as "trans" or "non-binary" or some other non-scientific fallacy, when in reality mere cosmetic alterations and mental gymnastics are best described as "extreme drag." However, to avoid being sued (or terminated from Twister or Fakebook) for not yielding to such demands to "acknowledge" their "choice" of "gender identity" by instead using their actual biological cellular essence as the basis for pronouning them, I will acknowledge their refusal to acknowledge reality by using these ideal terms that are as vague and unreal as their own sense of reality.
Of course, if you continue to use the old anglo-saxon terms that I've used since I got out of diapers to refer to me, or scrap them and just use "Steve" or "Steve's" in every pronounesque instance, I won't get offended, huffy, or litigious. I leave that to the woke.
I have also considered requiring those who insist on their own idiosyncratic pronouns to refer to me as "his majesty/his majesty/his majesty's" as in "His majesty is pleased you like his majesty and his majesty's writings"! Wait, even better... "His Majesty is pleased you like His Majesty and His Majesty's writings"! Yes, capitalization should be strictly followed since each simply substitutes for "Steve/Steve's" and nobody would think to write those in all lower case.